The effect of science technology society (STS) learning model on science literation in physical learning reviewed from cognitive style
Abstract
The purpose of this study is 1) to analyze differences in scientific literacy of students between groups of students who study learning model STM and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI), 2) to analyze the effect of the interaction between the learning model STM with cognitive style on scientific literacy of students, 3) Analyzing the difference differences in scientific literacy of students between groups of students who study learning model STM and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) which have a cognitive style field dependent (FD), and 4) to analyze the differences differences scientific literacy of students between groups of students who study learning model STM and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) which have a cognitive style field independent (FI). This study is a quasi-experimental design with posttest only control group design. The study population was all students of class XI MIA Denpasar Hope Christian High School in the academic year 2018/2019. Decision-class research group based random sampling technique. Data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and ANOVA two lanes. The results of the analysis states the following. (1) there are differences in the results of scientific literacy scores physics, among students who study learning model Science Technology Society (STM) with students learning with learning model DI (F = 79,32; p <0.05), (2) there are significant interaction between the learning model STM learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) on the scientific literacy of students (F = 76,23; p < 0.05) and. (3) there are differences in students' science literacy among the group of students who studied with STM learning model and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) students who have the cognitive style of field independent (FI), (F = 20,75; p < 0.05), (4) there differences in students' science literacy among the group of students who studied with STM learning model and learning model of Direct Instruction (DI) students who have the cognitive style of field dependence (FD), (F = 15,60; p < 0.05).References
Sisdiknas. (2003). Kurikulum 2004 SMA: Pedoman Khusus Pengembangan Silabus dan Penilaian Mata Pelajaran Kimia. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Yager, R.E. (1996). Science/Technology/Society, As Reform in Science Education. New York: State University of New York Press.
Sudiatmika, A A I R. (2014). Pengembangan alat ukur tes literasi sains siswa SMP dalam konteks budaya bali. Laporan Penelitian. Jurusan Pendidikan Fisika Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja.
Sadia, I W. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran sains kontruktivistik. Buku Ajar. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja.
Hurd, J.R. (1985). Scientific Literacy. United State of America : Prentice Hall, Inc.
Suastra, I W. (2013). Pembelajaran sains terkini: Mendekatkan siswa dengan lingkungan alamiah dan sosial budaya. Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Kurniawan, E. (2010). Pengaruh Bentuk tes Formatif dan gaya kognitif terhadap hasil belajar membaca bahasa Indonesia (eksperimen di SMP Negeri 5 Depok). Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan Vol 1 (1): 24-41.
Nazir (2003). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D). Bandung : Alfabeta.
Montgomery, D.C. (1996). Design and analysis of experiment. Fitht edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Wiersma (1990). Developing Minds: a resource book for teaching thinking. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract viewed = 155 times
PDF downloaded = 160 times
