Evaluasi rel dan bantalan berdasarkan beban angkut lintas dan kinerja operasi kereta api (studi kasus: jalan rel Tanjung Karang-Rejosari)
Abstract
In the railway sector, its development has received quite important attention from the government, especially with the establishment of railways as a national strategic plan. The railway network on the island of Sumatra stretches for 1,544 km, including those operating in Lampung Province which is overseen by Regional Division IV Tanjung Karang. Rail transportation in Lampung province is overseen by Regional Division IV Tanjung Karang. In 2022, train services at Tanjung Karang Station recorded services to 556,219 passengers, this data increased by 150.461% from the previous year. This research is important in order to understand how different cross loads affect the condition of rails and sleepers, train operators can plan more effective maintenance, identify vulnerable points, and reduce the risk of operational disruption. This research aims to determine the amount of cross haul loads annually and what is the condition of the ability of rail services and sleepers to accept the traffic loads on them and the impact on operational performance, especially on the realization of train trip scheduling. This research uses a descriptive quantitative method, namely evaluating the condition of the railroad based on secondary data obtained from related agencies. The results of this research show that the Tanjung Karang-Rejosari railroad is categorized as class I railroad, the condition of the installed rails is not in accordance with standards because the basic stress of the rail exceeds the basic stress permitted, so it is necessary to upgrade the rail from R.54 to R.60, to the current condition of the installed bearings is good to serve the annual traffic loads that occur. The operational realization of train travel schedules for both arrival and departure times has been well programmed based on the maximum planned delay time limit. In general, train delays in Regional Division IV Tanjung Karang generally originate from the infrastructure aspect with the percentage of causes of delays being 81.49%. This value illustrates that aspects of railroad infrastructure or structure are the biggest contributor to train delays.
References
Adi, W. T. (2019). Kajian Umur Jalan Rel Berdasarkan Keausan Dengan Metode Dari Area dan Perjana. III (November).
Aulia, A. Z. (2019). Perancangan Aspek Teknis Dan Operasional Jalur Rel Sebagai Penunjang Proyek Revitalisasi Jembatan Perlintasan Kereta Api Koridor Kayu Tanam – Padang Panjang – Batu Tabal.
BPS. (2023). Lalu Lintas Penumpang Melalui Stasiun Kereta Api Tanjung Karang. Retrieved from Provinsi Lampung Dalam Angka 2023.
Djajasinga, N. D. (2015). Keselematan Perkeretaapian.
Fistcar, W. A., Widyastuti, H., & Prastyanto, C. A. (2020). Pengaruh Parameter Track Quality Indeks (Tqi) Terhadap Perilaku Bantalan Beton (Studi kasus: Track Quality Indeks (TQI) penyimpangan geometri 25 mm-40 mm). Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, 18(1), 131–138.
Hastuti, U. J., Hidayat, M., & Firdaus, M. I. (2020). Ketepatan Waktu dan Okupansi Terhadap Kinerja Kereta Api Joglosemarkerto Punctuality and Load Factor of Joglosemarkerto Rail Transport’s Performance.
Ihlas, A. (2017). Analisis kerusakan rel kereta api angkutan batubara. Jurnal Teknologi Bahan Dan Barang Teknik, 7(1), 7–16.
Jaya, F. H., & Miswanto. (2018). Evaluasi Struktur Atas Komponen Jalan Rel Berdasarkan Passing Tonnage (Studi Kasus : Jalan Rel Lintas Tanjung Karang – Bekri). Tapak Vol. 8 No. 1, 8(1), 33–45.
Jing, G., Siahkouhi, M., Edwards, J. R., Dersch, M. S., & Hoult, N. A. (2021). Smart railway sleepers-a review of recent developments, challenges, and future prospects. Construction and Building Materials, 271, 121533.
Karunianingrum, D. I., & Widyastuti, H. (2020). Penilaian Indeks Kualitas Jalan Rel (Track Quality Index) berdasarkan Standar Perkeretaapian Indonesia (Studi Kasus : Cirebon-Cikampek). Jurnal Aplikasi Teknik Sipil, 18(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.12962/j2579-891x.v18i1.5710
Kementerian Perhubungan. (2022). Laporan Monitoring Capaian Kinerja Triwulan I Tahun 2022. Kementerian Perhubungan Direktorat Jenderal Perkeretaapian
Kementerian Perhubungan (2018). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor KP 2128 Tahun 2018 Tentang Rencana Induk Perkeretaapian Nasional. Kementerian Perhubungan Direktorat Jenderal Perkeretaapian Nasional Republik Indonesia, 1–8.
Kementerian Perhubungan. (2012). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 60 Tahun 2012 tentang Persyaratan Teknis Jalur Kereta Api. Kementrian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, 1–57. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Download/138947/pm_no._60_tahun_2012.pdf
Kementerian Perhubungan. (2019). Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia Nomor Pm 18 Tahun 2019. Menteri Perhubungan Republik Indonesia, 0–23.
Lathif, M. R. (2017). Analisa Kinerja Operasional Kereta Api Penataran Jurusan Surabaya Gubeng – Malang – Blitar.
Liu, X., Saat, M. R., & Barkan, C. P. L. (2012). Analysis of Causes of Major Train Derailment and Their Effect on Accident Rates. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2289(1), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.3141/2289-20
Muhtarom, Z., & Ratih, S. Y. (2021). Analisis Kondisi Jalan Rel Kereta Api Pada Lintas Sragen-Solo Berdasarkan Nilai Track Quality Indeks (TQI). Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 17(1), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.28932/jts.v17i1.3440
Muspitasari, T., Sulistyowati, I., & Kumara, W. (2017). Evaluasi peraturan pembebanan gandar kereta api di pulau Jawa terhadap kondisi aktual. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 14(3), 182–187.
Perusahaan Jawatan Kereta Api. (1986). Peraturan Dinas No. 10 Tahun 1986 Tentang Perencanaan Kontruksi Jalan Rel. Perusahaan Jawatan Kereta Api.
PT. Kereta Api Indonesia. (2023). Grafik Perjalanan Kereta Api.
Rosyidi, S. A. (2015). Rekayasa Jalan Kereta Api Tinjauan Struktur Jalan Rel. 53–54.
Setiawan, Y. (2022). Evaluasi Kondisi Jalan Rel Lintas Kroya-Kutoarjo Jawa Tengah berdasarkan Track Quality Index (TQI). ISMETEK, 14(1).
Wahab, W., & Afriyani, S. (2017). Analisis kelayakan konstruksi bagian atas jalan rel dalam kegiatan revitalisasi jalur kereta api lubuk alung-kayu tanam (km 39,699-km 60,038). Jurnal Teknik Sipil Institut Teknologi Padang, 4(2), 1–8.
Wang, B. Z., Barkan, C. P. L., & Rapik Saat, M. (2020). Quantitative Analysis of Changes in Freight Train Derailment Causes and Rates. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, 146(11). https://doi.org/10.1061/JTEPBS.0000453
Wantana, A. H., Widyastuti, H., & Prastyanto, C. A. (2020). Prediksi Nilai Track Quality Index (TQI) Berdasarkan Data Frekuensi dan Beban Lalu Lintas untuk Lebar Sepur 1067 Arisma. Jurnal Penelitian Transportasi Darat, 20(1), 17–32.
Wibowo, A., Wicaksono, A., & Djakfar, L. (2015a). Evaluasi kinerja waktu tempuh kereta api segmen bojonegoro-kandangan. Rekayasa Sipil, 9(1), 74–80.
Wibowo, A., Wicaksono, A., & Djakfar, L. (2015b). Kinerja Waktu Tempuh Kereta Api Segmen Bojonegoro-Kandangan. Jurnal Transportasi, 15(3).
Yusuf, M. A., Roestaman, R., & Walujodjati, E. (2022). Evaluasi Struktur Atas Komponen Jalan Rel dalam Kegiatan Reaktivasi Jalur Cibatu Cikajang. Jurnal Konstruksi, 20(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.33364/konstruksi/v.20-1.926
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract viewed = 164 times
PDF downloaded = 151 times
