LEGAL CERTAINTY OF NOTARY POSITION REGARDING AUTHORITY TO CERTIFY ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS

  • Ida Bagus Wirya Dharma Faculty of Law, Universitas Tabanan, Indonesia
  • Putu Andhika Kusuma Yadnya Faculty of Law, Universitas Tabanan, Indonesia
  • I Wayan Antara Faculty of Law, Universitas Tabanan, Indonesia
  • I Kadek Adi Surya Faculty of Law, Universitas Tabanan, Indonesia
Keywords: Certainty, Notary Position, Certification, Electronic Transactions

Abstract

Article 15 paragraph (3) UUJN states that Notaries have other regulated authorities apart from those contained in Articles (1) and (2) which are regulated in statutory regulations. In the Elucidation to Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public, it is stated "What is meant by other authority regulated in statutory regulations", among other things, the authority to certify transactions carried out electronically (cyber). notary), making deeds of waqf pledges, and airplane mortgages. The author found that there is a vagueness of norms (vague van normen). This condition of norms, which is called vagueness of norms, occurs because statutory regulations are available but the formulation of the words or sentences is not clear, giving rise to multiple interpretations. The research method used is normative legal research using primary legal material sources and secondary legal material sources. Legal materials obtained from library materials are analyzed qualitatively using the deductive method of analysis. The research results obtained are that the legal position of electronic transaction certification is a function of electronic legalization of private deeds. Certification of transactions carried out electronically only refers to private deeds that are legalized by a Notary, therefore certification of electronic transactions will still be recognized in law, but the legal force in court is weakened because it is limited to private deeds only.

References

Adjie, H. (2008). Hukum Notaris Indoensia, Tafsir Tematik Terhadap UU No.30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. PT. Refika Aditama.

Arifian, A. D., & Kusriyah, S. (2021). The Investigation on Criminal Acts of Corruption in the Jurisdiction of Rembang Police. Law Development Journal, 3(3), 460. https://doi.org/10.30659/ldj.3.3.460-466

Arnawa, I. M., Kosasih, J. I., & Utama, I. W. K. J. (2024). Pembatalan Land Lease Agreement yang dialihkan kepada Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 4(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2565

Hage, J., & Akkermans, B. (2014). Introduction to Law. Springer.

Indradewi, A. A. S. N. (2021). Legal Regulations Copyright Transition At Perspective Ius Constituendum. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v9i1.32725

Jaya, J. A., Zulaeha, M., & Suprapto, S. (2022). Kewenangan Notaris dalam Mensertifikasi Transaksi Elektronik ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Notary Law Journal, 1(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.19

Kaff, F. Al, Muhaimin, M., & Haq, L. M. H. (2021). Comparative Study of the Legal Position of Notary in Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i1.2374

Krisyanto, T. H., Daulay, Z., & Beatrix, B. (2019). Strength of Evidence of Notarial Deed in the Perspective of Cyber Notary in Indonesia. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(3), 775. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i3.906

Kusumaatmaja, M., & Sidharta, B. A. (2000). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum: Suatu Pengenalan Pertama Ruang Lingkup Berlakunya Ilmu Hukum. Alumni.

Mashdurohatun, A., Gunarto, G., & Susilo, A. B. (2022). The Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights as Object of Fiduciary Guarantee. Jurnal Akta, 9(3), 378. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v9i3.26756

Miskiyya, C. Z., Gunarto, G., & Ma’ruf, U. (2021). Implementation of Notary Responsibility for Loss of Assets Due to Notary Error. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 3(1), 241. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.1.241-249

Putu Sekarwangi Saraswati, I. N. S. (2023). Cyber Notary Juridical Review In The Legal System In Indonesia. Russian Law Journal, 11(8s). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i8s.1378

Rahim, Y., Syafrinaldi, S., Thamrin, S., & Susanti, H. (2022). Legal Protection of Notary Officials according to Indonesian positive law. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 28, 344–355. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v28i1.5468

Saputra, R. A. H. (2023). The Legal Protection for Notaries against Civil Efforts on Authentic Deeds That Have Been Published. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 5(3). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.5.3.111-132

Tan, W., Agustini, S., & Situmeang, A. (2024). The Urgency of Implementing a Cyber Notary in Indonesia: A Comparative Study with The United States. SASI, 30(3), 274. https://doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v30i3.2258

Utama, I. W. K. J. (2022). Empowerment Of Bupda Reform Access In Village Land Asset Management In Bali. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 7(1), 9–12.

Utama, I. W. K. J. U. (2019). Tanggung Gugat Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i1.2261

Published
2024-12-16
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 0 times
PDF downloaded = 0 times