DUE DILIGENCE IN THE EXECUTION OF OFFICE AND THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES FOR NOTARIES
Abstract
A notary is the only public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds relating to all creations and legal events desired by the parties or as determined by the applicable law and has the aim that all legal acts and events have the power as perfect evidence. This research aims to discuss the Notary's authority to carry out due diligence in carrying out his office duties and the Notary's responsibility regarding his authority to carry out legal counseling regarding the making of deeds. The research method used in this research is a normative legal research method. Notaries in carrying out Due Diligence apply the precautionary principle with the limitation that if documents or information occur that are incorrect because they are fake or falsified, the Notary is not qualified to violate his/her official duties. The Notary's responsibility regarding his authority to provide legal counseling regarding the making of deeds is stated in Article 15 paragraph (2) of the Law on the Position of Notaries which states that notaries have the authority to provide legal counseling in relation to making deeds. In providing legal counseling in connection with the making of a deed, it means that the Notary has the authority to provide legal counseling in relation to the deed he or she is making.
References
A.R., P. (2011). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Indikator Tugas-Tugas Jabatan Notaris Yang Berimplikasi Perbuatan Pidana. Sofmedia.
Ariesta Rahman, F. (2018). Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Mengenal Para Penghadap. Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol3.iss2.art11
Arif Kurnia, R., & Ma’ruf, U. (2018). Implementasi Tugas Dan Kewenangan Notaris Dalam Membuat Akta Yang Berkaitan Dengan Pertanahan (Studi di Wilayah KerjaNotarisKabupaten Kendal). Jurnal Akta, 5(1), 295. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2618
Arliman, L. (2015). Notaris dan Penegakan Hukum Oleh Hakim. Deepublish.
Immanuella, C. N., & Hoesin, S. H. (2022). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Notaris/Ppat Terkait Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Oleh Pegawai Notaris/PPAT (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Blitar Nomor 10/Pdt.G/2020/PN Blt). PALAR | PAKUAN LAW REVIEW, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v8i1.4584
Kurnia, I., Mulyati, E., & Lubis, N. A. (2022). Penerapan Due Diligence Oleh Notaris Selaku Kuasa Dalam Permohonan Pendaftaran Atas Perubahan Sertifikat Jaminan Fidusia Online. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i2.920
Makmur, & Siregar, T. (2013). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Notaris Setelah Berakhir Masa Jabatannya Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris. Jurnal Mercatoria, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.21
Muhammad, A. (2006). Etika Profesi Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Pernando, L. (2022). Implikasi Hukum Terhadap Notaris (Suami-Istri) Yang Membuka Kantor Bersama Dalam Bentuk Persekutuan Perdata. Jurnal Officium Notarium, 2(3), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss3.art1
Pratama, I. P., Wisnaeni, F., & Cahyaningtyas, I. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Kewajibannya Dalam Hal Pembacaan Akta. Notarius, 14(2), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43806
Putri, K. M., Anwary, I., & Haiti, D. (2022). Kewajiban Notaris melakukan Pembacaan dan Penandatanganan Akta di Depan Semua Pihak secara Bersama-Sama. Notary Law Journal, 1(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.21
Rambe, R. (2011). Panduan Due Diligence (Legal Audit, Legal Opinion, Legal Reasoning). CV. Varia Advokat.
Santoso, A. (2020). Tindak Pidana Korupsi Yang Dilakukan Notaris-Ppat Dalam Menjalankan Kewenangan Jabatannya. Jurnal Hukum Dan Kenotariatan, 4(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukeno.v4i1.6448
Satjipto, R. (2006). Ilmu Hukum, Cet V. Keenam, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.
Sholiha, M. A. (2019). Notaris Tidak Memberikan Penyuluhan Hukum Sehubungan Dengan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) Status Objek Tanah Negara Dan Mengakibatkan Kerugian Materiilbagi Pembeli. Jurnal Media Hukum Dan Peradilan, 5(1).
Utama, I. W. K. J. (2022). Empowerment Of Bupda Reform Access In Village Land Asset Management In Bali. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 7(1), 9–12.
Utama, I. W. K. J. U. (2019). Tanggung Gugat Notaris Selaku Pejabat Umum Dalam Pembuatan Perjanjian Kredit Perbankan. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i1.2261
Wirahutama, D. (2018). Kecakapan Hukum Dan Legalitas Tandatangan Seorang Terpidana Dalam Menandatangani Akta Otentik. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 47(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.47.2.2018.118-127
Abstract viewed = 0 times
PDF downloaded = 0 times
