THE POSITION OF INSTRUMENTER WITNESS IN MAKING OF NOTARY DEEDS
Abstract
Instrumenter witnesses must be present while notaries are preparing an authentic deed. Therefore, the testimony of instrumenter witnesses can be the primary evidence against Notary deeds that violate legal norms, thus ensuring the safety of the Notary's position. The purpose of this study is to see and make an analysis of the requirements of instrumenter witnesses in the making of Notary deeds and review and analyze the testimony of instrumenter witnesses that can be used as the primary evidence against Notary deeds that violate legal norms. The type of research used in this study was normative legal research, which referred to primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The approaches were the statute approach and the conceptual approach. The technique of collecting legal materials was the technique of literature studies. The results showed that the absence of procedures for notary employees was a weakness in providing certainty and information to investigators. The vague legal norms in UUJN were related to the position and requirements of instrumenter witnesses in the making of Notary deeds. The role of instrumenter witnesses did not get legal certainty in the case of a problem regarding the deed made by the Notary. There must be legal protection for instrumenter witnesses who give evidence at trial because the role of the instrumenter with witnesses is generally different. Therefore, the instrumenter witness position in the notary deed involvement is given additionally in the clause in UUJN article 40, which regulates the witness in the making of the deed.
References
Ali, A., & Heryani, W. (2012). Asas-Asas Hukum Pembuktian Perdata. Kencana.
Amiruddin, & Asikin, H. Z. (2004). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Budiarsih. (2021). Health Law In Multiple Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/f273a
Cinantya, B. K., Suryono, A., & S., M. H. A. (2022). The Making of a Sale and Purchase Deed by the Land Deed Officer Process before the Signing of a Blank Form. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, 05(07). https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i7-39
Daus, R. D., Ismansyah, I., & Dasman, D. (2019). Legal Protection Against Notary Employee who Acts as Witness in Making Deed. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(2), 538. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i2.743
Erlina, Y., & Sinaulan, R. L. (2021). Fixed Term Work Agreement in Law No.11/2020 Concerning Job Creation : A Juridical Analysis. Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 7(2), 395. https://doi.org/10.37905/aksara.7.2.395-404.2021
Harahap, M. Y. (1993). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Jilid II. Pustaka Kartini.
Hieriej, E. O. S. (2012). Teori dan Hukum Pembuktian. Erlangga.
Hustam Husain, Kahar Lahae, & Marwah. (2022). MAKING A NOTARY DEED THAT PROVIDES LEGAL CERTAINTY. Awang Long Law Review, 5(1), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i1.548
Kholik, I., Warman, E., & Harianto, D. (2022). Legal Protection of the Defendant’s Property as Evidence in the Trial Process of Corruption. UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(2), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v9i2.6833
Kie, T. T. (1994). Studi Notariat Serba Serbi Praktek Notaris-Buku II. Ichtiar Baru.
Krisna Adi Kusuma. (2022). The Position and Responsibilities of Instrumental Witnesses in Deeds Made by Notaries according to UUJN. Jurnal Konstatering, 1(3), 1385–1398. https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/25389
Pakpahan, M., Idham, & Fadlan. (2021). Juridical Analysis of the Strength of Electronic Evidence in Handling the “Trusted” Online Arisan Fraud Handling (Research Study at the Tanjung Pinang Police). International Journal Of Advance Research And Innovative Ideas In Education, 7(6), 218–229. https://ijariie.com/AdminUploadPdf/Juridical_Analysis_of_the_Strength_of_Electronic_Evidence_in_Handling_the__Trusted__Online_Arisan_Fraud_Handling__Research_Study_at_the_Tanjung_Pinang_Police__ijariie15586.pdf
Parmono, B., Sunardi, S., & Kholifah, S. (2024). Legal Responsibility Of A Notary For Forgery Of The Debtor’s Personal Identity In The Deed Of The Credit Agreement In The Bank. International Significance of Notary, 5(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2020/ison.v5i1.24400
Safira, K., Asikin, Z., & Munandar, A. (2021). REGISTRATION OF A WILL DEED AT PROPERTY AND HERITAGE AGENCY (BALAI HARTA PENINGGALAN / BHP). Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 114. https://doi.org/10.7176/JLPG/114-06
Saputra, A. (2023). The Legal Protection for Instrumental Witnesses in Notarial Deeds. TABELLIUS: Journal of Law, 1(3). https://jurnal.unissula.ac.id/index.php/tabelius/index
Sasangka, H., & Rosita, L. (2003). Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana. Mandar Maju.
Sutrisno. (2007). Komentar UU Jabatan Notaris Buku II. Universitas Sumatera Utara.
Tjandra, R., & Chandera, H. (2001). Pengantar Praktis Penanganan Perkara Perdata. Universitas Atma Jaya.
Tobing, G. H. S. L. (1983). Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Erlangga.
Trismala, L., & Rahayu, M. I. F. (2022). The Role of the Notary Honorary Council on the Summon of a Notary by Police Investigators Regarding the Deed He Made. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.151
Utama, I. W. K. J. U. (2019). TANGGUNG GUGAT NOTARIS SELAKU PEJABAT UMUM DALAM PEMBUATAN PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN. DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 15(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.30996/dih.v15i1.2261
Widiyoko, S. (2021). The Strength of Proof on Underwrited Deed in Waarmeking by a Notary. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review, 3(3), 768. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.3.3.768-784
Wijaya, S., & Suparno, S. (2022). Legal Strength of Evidence Photocopy of Letter or Written Evidence in Civil Matter. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, ICLSSEE 2022, 16 April 2022, Semarang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.16-4-2022.2319836
Abstract viewed = 0 times
PDF downloaded = 0 times
